Most constitutional scholars think that the pledging and binding of electors it unconstitutional in the 24 states that have such laws, so much is it the original intention of the founders that we elect electors who then decide, not rubber stamp the state elections. Another question that may emerge is whether states can withhold their electors as a lot.
The arguments for the Electoral College are elucidated there. Those who claim to value the “Intent of the Framers” – if they really subscribe to that and are not just trotting that out whenever convenient – should read and learn that the Electoral College has been subverted. Read there, prescient descriptions of the kind of person, that is, THE PERSON, who is not yet president-elect. That only after ratification by the electoral college. The Intension of the Framers was clearly to block such a person as Trump from being President. If we were to do away with the Electoral College instead of repairing our system to enable it to function as intended, we will never be able to bring it back.
In the future, if someone also unqualified to be President – perhaps someone much less unqualified than Donald Trump or hard to imagine but “God Help Us More So”…
View original post 27 more words