See also: Seized for Mere Speech, May 5th and Russian Methods in Contemporary U.S. Politics, from April
Who will pay for the stigma?
Again, perjury was committed in submitting a false mental heath warrant to have me seized and treated involuntarily. I have attempted to press charges through the county police, who apparently will do nothing. The charges arise out of mere speech: things that I say, which happen to be true. My error was to discuss politics with Trump supporters and perhaps to discuss household matters in my own home with persons who have disordered moods and are on prescription medications which inhibit thought. Others have heard things said, and spun their own additions to these, without asking me to clarify any errors. “I have done nothing wrong, and said nothing false, but am seized for mere speech,” I kept saying as I demanded a lawyer and informed the police and hospital that they had no right to hold me. When these relatives- who have known me for over fifty years- learned that they could not have me involuntarily “helped” or treated- which is done today principally with prescription drugs, contrary to my religion, politics, psychology and medical understanding- these relatives simply lied to say I was a “danger to myself or others.” That is perjury, and the papers filed with the court do say that they swear the account to be true “under penalty of perjury.” There are three or four demonstrable lies in the accusation. After twenty days and an “independent analysis,” by a psychologist who had no interest in covering for the system or selling drugs, retained by my court appointed lawyer, I was cleared of the charge and released, as I surely am less a danger to “myself or others” than anyone you know. But by their perjury and delusions, these persons have in fact done quite a bit of harm.
That perjury is true can be demonstrated in court especially from text message conversations held with three of the persons who participated to have me seized. Ulterior motives are suspected, and I would have my wealthy Trumpster uncle questioned regarding connections inside the Trump organization which led to this rather heinous act. I had called him a “fool, ” and been threatened by my sister for such a crime, that I would see why I should not say such a thing to such a one. I think that was after I caught on that he was forwarding messages sent to him out of context to demonstrate how I needed “help.” This uncle seems to have encouraged a sister and brother, ready to twist text message statements that any judge or jury would never take to be threatening without the added animus of filial faction. We simply cannot allow our courts or political speech to be abused in this way. So far, no one will help or press charges, and I find I am stigmatized: people seem more ready to believe that I must be “crazy” if I was taken away! After all, I say many things they do not understand. I am a PhD in Politics, with degrees in psychology and philosophy, and have written four books. But the primary motivation does seem to be political: I saw the Trump Russian collusion, and many other things, before it was commonly discussed in the media. I also think that I have been acted against by my own government due to demonstrable proximity to intelligence agencies, and may well have been blacklisted for asking for an inquiry into this matter. The simplest questions simply have not been asked, and I have presented my representatives plenty of reason to ask such questions, as is usual when such questions arise in America as in almost every other nation. What is clear, though, is that someone has an interest in my being declared insane, so that what I say may be discounted due to its source- another typical Trumpster method.
Crazy people say false things. Find one thing I have ever said that can be demonstrated false- I’m sure there is one somewhere! My trouble seems to be that I am poor, unusually dedicated, and serve the truth and my family and my country without fee and in disregard of threats. I must be crazy! And now I have the stigma: Most to whom I tell the story assume that my incarceration might or must have been correct. Imagine if, beyond the stigma, one were to receive the stigmata! And do you not understand what I say? If not, is this my deficiency?
It is contrary to our fundamental law and our constitution to seize a person who has done nothing wrong and said nothing false, or nothing he does not have a perfect right to do or say. Political and filial faction cannot be the judge of sanity and dangerousness.
WHO WILL STAND FOR OUR CONSTITUTION!