Re-vote Revived! Supreme Court Asked Again to Void 2016 Election Due to Russian Interference

This is copied from the legal strategy section of the Our Case category in the menu of Re-Vote 2017:

“Educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.”

            ~ Thomas Jefferson

The theories upon which we base our Petition for Writ of Mandamus are:

  • Fraud was perpetrated against the American People and theFederal Government,
    such that the election was void ab initio.
  • Peoples’ right to vote was diluted or nullified and violated their fundamental and basic rights under the Constitution.
  • Rights to due process were violated.
  • Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution was violated when we were invaded by the actions of the Russians.
  • Cyber invasions constitute one means by which the United States Army and the United States Navy recruit.
  • The occupant of the Oval Office, or his agents, acted in collusion with the Russians.
  • The Legislative and Executive branches were compromised and only the judicial branch is an effective source of remedy.

You can read our Petition for Writ of Mandamus, now assigned docket #16-1464 at the Supreme Court here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9M

U0vPvtO6_RjF3OVNoNWNoSHc/view

We have posted a separate copy of our Petition for Writ of Mandamus with notes written by our core team.  We’re calling it the Citizen’s Guide to our Petition for Writ of Mandamus because we have tried to make it easy to understand the legalese.  You can take a look here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AtTNhnjiQCDZhWB23r63YhouNA_pjplim1XYLscpm2Q/edit?ts=59375824

This is copied from the Media page of the Re-Vote website, so the links and videos do not work, but go there-MM

a Writ of Mandamus

Updates

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9MU0vPvtO6_RjF3OVNoNWNoSHc/view?usp=sharing

Supreme Court Advances Lawsuit to Nullify Trump Administration

Print

by Maya M.
Democratic Moms

The Trump administration has gotten its first heartbreak from the Resistance. The nightmare is ending, and the political gladiators have stepped out to make sure that they fight to the finish.

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has defiled Trump as it advanced a case that might kick the entire Republicans out of the White House. Trump would be battling for his life as SCOTUS gets ready on March 17 for the early stages of hearing this dared case called Blumenthal vs. U.S.

If this case is successful, Trump and his ‘boys’ would be leaving the presidency. There is no doubt that cases at the Supreme Court are complex and require steps that must be conquered before a decision is taken.

It is vital that the puzzle is carefully understood bit by bit. In the Constitution, the basis for this case is referred to as the “Guarantee Clause.” the government would be tasked by this clause in ensuring that America is safe from terrorism.

Attorneys are going to argue fiercely that the 2016 election was invaded by the Russians. Thus, there should be a nullification of the entire election as it has violated the country’s Constitution. You should be aware that the hearing of the case on March 17th is not going to be a complete case. It is the Special Master who was appointed by the American court that would show off the evidence from the both sides

The justices would then decide if the hearing case was able to meet the standard that would lead to a full-blown case. If four justices out of the eight can agree that the case met the requirement, the case is good to move forward.

We are swimming in the murky waters of the American politics because the people have never gotten the opportunity to challenge an entire election that is stringently based on the Guarantee Clause, the people who brought the case might have to find another place for legal precedent.

If the legal precedent is to be achieved, the citizens cited cases that came from both Ukraine and Austria in which revotes were needed after a decision has been reached. The irony to this presentation is that Ukraine may be vital in overturning the Russian government.

Donna Soodalter-Toman, Nancy Goodman, and Diane Blumstein were the citizens who brought the matter to the courts. The lower courts first saw the case and stated that it was a “novel constitutional question.” But, they ended the matter by saying that it was better left in the hands of another government arm, like FBI, to decide if there was a significant role that Russians played in the election.

The Obama administration in a response released information in which it was seen that 17 executive agencies all accepted that there was Russia interference in electing Trump. Since the lower court decided on this matter, more evidence has been revealed that Trump got involved with the Russians. The resignation of Michael Flynn is one of the examples.

The first thing we have to do is to support the brave women who brought the case to the Supreme Court.

Occupy Democrats Interview

Radio

https://html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/5178541/height/90/width/auto/theme/custom/autonext/no/thumbnail/yes/autoplay/no/preload/no/no_addthis/no/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/000000/

 

Episode 1 of OD Political Radio featured an interview with members of Revote 2017, their lawyer, and the petitioners asking the Supreme Court to nullify the 2016 election results. The original OD story is from February:

Occupy Democrats

5 thoughts on “Re-vote Revived! Supreme Court Asked Again to Void 2016 Election Due to Russian Interference

  1. Hello Mr. McDonald,
    Thank you for supporting our cause and efforts. Please contact Kirstin Elaine Martin, another member of ReVote2017’s core leadership team, to discuss our Supreme Court Case (docket # 16-1464). – kirstin@sparx3.com or 978-394-8940. We are updating our website – as Kirstin can discuss with you. We also have YouTube channel that you can find by searching ReVote2017 on YouTube.
    Thank you for helping to save Democracy with us!
    Amy Shapiro, M.Ed.

    • Thanks! I am reading though the written case, a bit slow due to cats and old age! M. Small has done a fine, high powered job, succinct, as this could be 7000 pages long. I want to write a Friend Letter. Kirsten’s site does not come up yet. The intimidation and my general internet experience, protected by Kaspersky, are significant legal points (I received death threats-must be on the right path! Jefferson Lives!). We also want to suggest a redo of the electoral college if they deny this case for no reason again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s