Click on the topics in the menu across the top of this screen. Do you see the seven sections or “pages”? Scroll up, or Look up!
Help Publish a Book on the The Revelation, the last book in the Bible
If anyone wishes to help me or to promote writing, I will offer to double the amount of an investor in order to publish my book The Revelation: The vision and Letter of St. John to the Churches, through West Bow press. The money may be sent to the publisher directly, with the first proceeds sent directly to the investor until the original amount is returned, followed by 50% of the proceeds until the investment is doubled. Publication will cost between about 900 and 3500$, depending upon the quality of promotion and editing contracted, so the investor may choose. West Bow Press is connected with Zondervan, and so should provide quality editing. I have edited the work myself seven times. The first chapter is available in the Philosophy section of this website. My first book did not lose money for the publisher, and this topic was chosen in part because books on this subject do sell. I have another book, on music lyrics and interpretation, available complete in the Menu above.
About this Website
“Likes” have been disabled by the author, so that only wordpress users are allowed to “like” anything (as explained below).
McDonald Philosophy and Politics is a website for the publication of e-books, essays, articles and thoughts on philosophy and politics. It is hosted by Mark A. McDonald, Ph. D, the author of the book On Shakespeare’s King Lear with the Tempest, and the article On Hamlet and the Reformation. The book The Revelation: A reading of the Vision and Letter of John to the Churches was available on the Revelation page for 12$, with the first chapter available for free, but the e-junkie account was cancelled for the lack of two sales, because WordPress blocked search engine access to my website while awaiting extortion fees. The book is now “out of print,” and I will hope to see them in court, but likely will not be able to afford access to the U. S. courts. WordPress keeps writers in their own little internet, the writers make no money while Matt Melonwedge makes millions from advertising. We will try to publish in another way, but that too will likely be impossible should these political circumstances continue. Surely it is my fault, to watch years of work go down the drain and be a bit bitter.
You may print single paper copies of anything here for reading and study purposes. Thoughts and comments are most welcome. A blog is also posted at mmcdonald777.wordpress.com. A blank website appeared when constructing this one, so I have used it to write about cats, at mmcdonald77/Cats. Advertisements are involuntary, not selected for content, and will be deleted when we can “upgrade.” If these cross the line into involuntary shopping, please report this to the author.
A Note: Comments, followers and “likes” are being inhibited by the powers, apparently because we do not do Facebook, give our information to Google, nor pay extortion to WordPress. In order to “like” anything, one must sign up for WordPress, which I just learned, and cannot yet advise one to do. Is information being collected and brokered in order for us to communicate? This control of speech and access is contrary to the First and Fifth Amendments, and the courts will uphold that understanding of the Free Speech and liberty clauses. A private business cannot, for example, prevent one from constitutionally protected free speech, and if they do, they can be sued, in the courts of the government whose purpose is “to secure these rights.” Does WordPress too inhibit access to the internet, while keeping our writing to circulate only among WordPress accounts, making their own little internet at everyone else’s expense, their own little Facebook company, but with writing instead of social media for content? Are they not liable, for example, if knowing about road salt or rainwater might have kept some lead out of the people in Flint? When we complained about access, we were offered help gaining access to the internet for a sliding scale of up to 1000$, complete with foreign voices and the sounds of a busy office in the background. We pay 60$ per month to Charter for physical access to the internet, which the search engines and website building companies do not own. One might pave driveways for a living and then block access to the road without payola. One hires a driveway paving company, even for a traded favor, and comes home to find a concrete toll booth blocking ones access to the street complete with a guard demanding extortion fees. The company does not own the internet, and a search engine, we say, must be just that, and not a fee for access system. We, the people need to put a stop to this, beginning with a petition to WordPress and to Congress.
The fact of their control of internet access can be established by a mathematical comparison of search engine and word of mouth traffic. We get token or zero traffic on some 7 sections and hundreds of pages with so many words on them that if one tenth of searches listed these examples tenth, we would have more readers and comments, sold a few books by now, and started some other books and projects that require investment. Did our Kickstarter campaigns fail because of lack of basic search engine traffic, or because we are not really “on” the internet at all, but only on WordPress? If WordPress takes confidence in our not being able to sue them because it is a free website, we will remind them that it is illegal to enslave people, even on the internet, even if they have not paid you and you provide them a mutually beneficial service. In exchange for our content, on which they may advertise, they have provided a website, and the assumption is that the website is on the internet, rather than in its own little bubble. Perhaps the driveway paver would shift the opening of ones driveway to go into an underground cave, or a whole different highway system.
And will they say their service agreement that we signed or agreed to gives them the power to legally control our access to the internet and to limit likes and comments to those who give them information? They have given themselves these powers, and even gone with their money into congress to make these things law and legal? While congress sleeps, and profits? Can they give themselves the power to enslave us, in exchange for essential communications, as the phone lines once were? Can they give themselves a racket, set up extortion systems and call this legal because they have paid off Congress? Perhaps we will see.