Everyone knows that all “conspiracy theories” are false, right? Then any conspiracy can perpetrated, and has a very great head start.
For example, because setting my ex-fiance on me was so unbelievable, “they” were free to do it, and they knew no one would ever look into it. That is the kind of stuff they do, things that would seem incredible, like, the cop on the twitter may not be your friend, the porno girl may be delivering a message about the “puzzle pieces,” etc. The website with the FBI anagram may be delivering a threat- no one will believe it.
Donald Trump was free to commit treason, perhaps, and election fraud, and no one would believe it, at least until he had already seized tyrannic power, as will occur in just seven days, if it has not occurred already. Some see parts, and do things like actually question FBI director Comey, but none can even raise the comprehensive question. And if one says it, they want to drug you.
But consider the things now acceptable to common opinion that only two months ago were found, one by one, to be so incredible. To this day, I am the only one publicly mentioning Kaspersky in the hypothesis. We consider these things as hypotheses, and know we do not know that these hypotheses are false until they are refuted. “Tyrants do things like that” is a great principle, but no one commonly even believes there really are tyrants, let alone studies what happens to warp their souls. They just clean up after Auschwitz, if there is victory enough to have a clean up crew.
Another great principle is “look under that rock, and one may find a snake.” Sometimes we might make a mistake, which is why we need other minds to consider. And indeed, we do not look with our hands. But there is not a single thing false on this entire website that I know of, or I would correct it. We need to arrest Donald Trump and end this charade, before we find out what Putin has in store for us.
That- that anything incredible is fair game for the intelligence community- is related to a teaching of Machiavelli. In saying that no one will believe the few who might see him, he says it this way, “…and there is no one in this world but the vulgar.” Very few can even entertain the hypothesis regarding what he has done in order to destroy Christianity, not only that of Pope Alexander (a bad guy who held the keys the same as Francis and John Paul II) but all of it. He thinks, apparently, that his tyrannic teaching is the “political life,” without love and friendship, and is angry that Jesus taught men not to worship “mammon.” Do not be angry with me, for calling us “vulgar,” but take up the argument with him. No, rather, do not, because most cannot even read Machiavelli without being corrupted. The parameters of our world inside the cave are just too narrow. He was the leading thinker at my “Catholic” College, the centerpiece of the study of the best teacher there. That man, without explanation or apparent or stated cause, will not speak to me, from the moment my dissertation defense was completed, blacklisting me and destroying my career. (Without a nod from one’s grad school, one can never be more than an adjunct- which requires no verbal recommendation, and which pays only minimum wage.) To repay my loans, I taught American Government, quite successfully, at OCC for ten years, and taught philosophy at St. Mary’s for four years, till the question of the oath came up. I call it even, though they do not, and I can never own property in my life- a slave. But when a full time job opened up, the other teachers, -who for American Government taught not the principles, which is much too hard, but rather, pleasing things, like rock and roll and baseball and how to win elections so one could get jobs on campaign staffs- had to hire a woman, who did not even have a politics degree, let alone a PhD, but a JD. The University of Dallas is the only Catholic college, or one of very few, where, interestingly, in order to teach human things (as distinct from say science and math), one need not swear the Catholic oath, contrary to current Church doctrine. The oath is contrary to the explicit teaching of Jesus. They do a little Aristotle, but seem to think there is, like, something wrong with the Plato-Shakespeare thing, or they might have hired me.
I seem to keep getting accused of black magic, perhaps because I see things they perhaps assume I could not know if I were not a spy. When I learned, and declined the “invitation” to be vetted and possessed by the CIA while studying the soul and spying on my students, I told my best teacher- on a phone that was safe- told him that Russia would convert, because I saw it. Despite the danger to myself, it was my duty to tell. It may have been at Reykjavik, but it may have been as early as Geneva- I’ll have to check. Gorbachev had just come in, and I did not even know about Fatima, but saw a lot of that somehow while reading Lao Tzu, and having what is called a “nervous breakdown,” from trying, and failing, to “integrate” the big surprise. I left school that semester, having read “too much” Nietzsche, left so I could simply set it all aside till I could catch up. But then I received a letter when I arrived up here, delivered by one who picked me up from the airport. I shook like a leaf, cause I knew it was all real. Incidentally, I have never been “diagnosed,” because I do no harm nor violate the rights of anyone, and don’t want their “medicine.” I want to sue them for setting my ex-fiance on me, getting me to fall in love with her steely heart after seventeen years of celibacy. She attended, and eventually destroyed, my free classes called Salem Academy. My solitude was occasioned by another lady who I also want someone to look into, as she had a Russian roommate, and I, unknowingly, had teachers in the CIA. One can just never be too sure. I submitted a seven page demonstration to Senator Stabenow, with some proof, but she, just like Representative Walberg, also will not speak to me about it at all. Apparently “they”- the agencies- go around forbidding people to speak to me, and even Congress obeys. National security, you know. I wanted them to ask the CIA if it were true, that my fiance, of ten f’n years, was set on me, but they would not, and the Agency will lie anyway, not only for genuine security, but also for self interest when they make mistakes. The two agencies cultivate different characters. While the FBI are the upright, ethical, strait guys, the CIA are wild men with high spirit, daring and heroic in another way.
The prophet Hosea was also given a prostitute for a “wife.” Has anyone considered that she may have been a spy? Marlowe was probably murdered (though may have escaped) and these things have a lot to do with the theme of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. These things do happen, as they did happen to Hamlet, though no one can stand to hear it even described, nor even see it in the play when it is right in front of them. John Alvis, in his essay on Hamlet, thinks there is, like, something wrong with Hamlet, and there is- his flaw is revenge, like Luther, but one cannot understand his failure to get around revenge if one does not understand the significance of what they have done to him in setting Ophelia on him to learn his secret. Alvis thinks it is “misogyny,” if I remember correctly. He just thinks badly of those nice women in the play. And remember, in Hamlet, the Ghost is real.
But to return, one might say that the Lord is pissed, because of the violation of marriage. I probably would not have been vulnerable to this, and it probably would not have happened, had I obeyed the marriage law. Lao Tzu writes that the “sage” has “no place for death to enter.” So my own flaw did allow this setting of the fiance to occur. And they curiously avoid official marriage, which is also required to teach at a Catholic college. But the truth is that marriage is holy. The CIA cannot fathom that, and literally does not know what they are doing when they whore the baptized for the purpose of spying on them.
Now, a whole generation now does not have the principles of liberty because we whored education, the goal of which is said to be what- “Jobs” and “technology.” But education is not an instrument to be used for spying, nor is education primarily for money or power, but for the cultivation of the soul and the transmission of our principles of liberty from one generation to the next. We, the United States, might repent, and avoid disaster, as Nineva does in the Book of Job. But that- a national penance- is quite unlikely.
I do not know if that teacher ever told anyone that Russia would convert. I said then that they would convert from Communism because, just as Reagan says, they could not keep up with the free market if we take the arms race into space. But I saw it when Gorby got up from the table, which he did when Reagan would not give up on “Starwars,” the missile defense. Reagan was right. I saw it and said it although I was a liberal then, a Jesus Hippie, as I am to this day. Jesus hippies are rejected by all the “conservative” Christians, such as the Reformed Church people around Grand Rapids. These require a certain appearance, such as a sidewall haircut, you know, like St. Paul and Jesus had, with nice clean clothes. I am being sarcastic, because Paul teaches the Roman haircut in a letter, while Jesus of course had long hair like a Hebrew.
Looking back on it, and looking at the history as it emerged, Russia was then ready to roll over Europe, much as they are right now, and already had money printed for West Germany- remember the old world? Once I wondered why I said that, or what significance it could have had. If what I said was reported, it may have prevented Reagan from nuking Russia, because they did not think he would do it. But Reagan is like Clint- no one with whom to play chicken, or one just might make his day. No one even cares, for example, that one Russian man, a hero named Mr. Stanislav Petrov, prevented our East Coast from being nuked about 1991 or 2. Look him up: one day, when he was substituting at the button, fake reports came in that Russia was under attack. Mr Petrov, apparently, disobeyed an order to launch- at least that is the story. And that is not the only time the world came very close. Because of the principle called M.A.D., what one does to another is likely to be done to the one doing this, and that is the reason, paradoxically, that missile defenses were feared as though they were offensive, even if they were not. I would tell the story of the hero Petrov to my American government class, and most would blink at me like Nietzschean last men, even before Oxy. Stanislav is incidentally the name of a great Polish Saint, and the name of the Church where my grandparents were married.
So, right now if I were in Barack’s chair, I would “take away the fruits,” the U.S. election, the Philippines, the Brexit, France, and the U.S. primaries, and insist upon the safety of Aleppo, very publicly and openly. As the “republicans” will if we turn back the Russian election of 2016, Putin will take his self interest and go home, just like a robber caught by Clint Eastwood breaking in. And if I were in the chair of Putin, I would focus those steely ass eyes of mine and do it.
mmcdonald77 